House Appropriations sends $28B budget to full House
Posted on 6/14/2017 4:35:00 AM.

The House Appropriations Committee has approved a $28 billion budget plan that spends more than what they proposed in the regular session, but still less than what the Senate and governor wanted. The new proposal represents 98.94 percent of the state income forecast that would be spent.

“Just about a 50-50 split. We originally sent over $206 million, and this is about $100 million being spent and being kept aside. Just trying to work a compromise here," said Chairman Cameron Henry.

Henry says there has been a lot said and written in the media about the House not willing to compromise, and he hopes this proposal shows that is not the case. But he says he's not holding his breath that the upper chamber or the administration will negotiate.

“They want all or nothing, and I think they’re just going to use saying no as many times as they can and threatening special sessions after this special session unless they get exactly what they want," Henry said.

But Commissioner of Administration Jay Dardenne says that $100 million dollars being held back is money the state might need in the mid-year that they wouldn't be able to spend. He says the responsible way to deal with the budget is to appropriate the dollars that are available.

“Let us exercise the caution that we have exercised in the past and that you’ve recognized we’ve exercised in the past in order to prepare for the event that there may be a mid-year cut," Dardenne said.

Dardenne says they want to see all of the money appropriated, but the administration will let agencies know to hold back money in case of a midyear shortfall.

“To be cautious and to be prudent and manage the shortfall that may exist in a responsible way without leaving that money on the table and without forcing the reductions that you’re going to see," Dardenne said.

Under the latest proposal, $100 million would be left on the table as opposed to $206 million. The full House will debate the spending plan Wednesday.

 
 
 
 
 
Cameron Henry, Jay Dardenne, special session, budget



  • 5 key moments from Trump and Putin on Russian-US election interference

    Trump questions U.S. intelligence, saying he holds "both nation's responsible."
  • Senators dispute Trump's assessment of election hacking

    Senators Mark Warner and Marco Rubio both criticized the President's perceived ambiguity on Russia's involvement in the 2016 election.
  • Trump tells Hannity Russians 'have no information on Trump'

    The president told the TV host U.S.-Russia relations are now in better shape.
  • The Note: After Trumpís performance, what next?

    The TAKE with MaryAlice Parks What happens now? Before the extraordinary press conference Monday, the German foreign minister said in an interview: "We can no longer fully rely on the White House." After President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin stood side by side, some Republican lawmakers, and Trump's intelligence chief, seemed to agree. A number of Republicans on Capitol Hill had strong words, calling Trump's performance "disgraceful," "bizarre," "a sign of weakness." But what comes next? Do they censure the president? Subpoena his advisers? Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer called for hearings and that the president be mandated to sit for an interview with the special counsel. Putin said Monday that courts should speak next. In democracies, final conclusions are delivered by trial. Of course, it will be hard for the U.S. to drag Russian actors before a judge, but it's worth remembering the indictment brought by the Justice Department last week was...
Provided by ABC News


Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved | Privacy Policy


This site powered by PromoSuite Interactive